7HR02 Assignment Example

GitLab’s Resourcing and Talent Strategy

GitLab’s resourcing and talent strategy is significantly influenced by the global trend towards remote work. This outside factor has both proven to be a help and a burden to the company (Choudhury et al, 2020). On the one hand, the rise of remote work has allowed GitLab to access a vast pool of talent from around the world. That way the company could hire the most qualified people no matter where they lived. In addition, working from home has eliminated the fixed costs of an office building, like rent utilities and cleaning services.

However, working remote has also proved to be a difficult aspect for GitLab. One of the hardest things to do is establish and uphold a company culture when everyone is virtual. GitLab has attempted to mitigate this by stressing transparency, communication, and community building activities (Painter, 2024). However, it is still difficult to ensure that the employees feel involved if they’re working at home. The other issue is how to deal with the team work and collaboration in a dispersed environment. GitLab has invested heavily in tools and infrastructure to support remote work, but effective communication and collaboration still require careful planning and coordination.

In summary, the rise of remote work across the world has greatly influenced GitLab’s resourcing and talent strategy. Although this has provided some advantages such as acquiring good talent and saving money, it has also brought about some difficulties in establishing a sense of company culture and dealing with team issues. How well GitLab is able to surpass these hurdles will determine its longevity.

There are a few things that GitLab will need to do or change in order to continue to flourish. One such area of improvement is making use of the latest collaboration tools and technologies (Arefeen & Schiller, 2019). While GitLab likely uses effective platforms, exploring new options, including AI-powered tools, can further enhance remote teamwork and reduce communication barriers. Also, the company could host more virtual happy hours and team building activities so that employees get to know each other better because one of the problems with working remotely is the isolation.

To address the challenges of remote work culture, GitLab could implement more structured onboarding processes for new employees to help them integrate into the company culture and establish connections with their colleagues. The company could also do something like provide the opportunity for all the team members to meet in person regularly, like company retreats or even regionals. GitLab may also want to look into some kind of project management tool that give a good visual of where a project is and its dependencies. Also the company could do some things like have mentorship programs or job rotations to promote cross-functional collaboration and knowledge sharing.

Through these tactics, GitLab will only improve its remote work plan, and will be able to overcome the difficulties of this type of work. By creating a more interesting, interactive, and welcoming remote working atmosphere, the organization will not only be able to hire and keep the best employees, but also continue to innovate and reach its overall objectives.

Internal force driving GitLab’s resourcing and talent strategy.

The company culture of GitLab is an internal force that molds its resourcing and talent strategy. This culture, characterized by transparency, inclusivity, and a relentless focus on learning and growth, plays a crucial role in attracting, retaining, and developing top talent (Choudhury et al, 2020).

One of the things that stands out about GitLab’s culture is its transparency. The company releases a lot of information to the public, such as team meetings and financial metrics and strategic plans. This level of transparency fosters trust, accountability, and a sense of community among employees. That also makes it easier to attract and keep talent that appreciates open communication and transparency. One other important aspect of GitLab’s culture is its inclusiveness. The company is very aggressive in its attempts to make a diverse and accepting atmosphere for every employee no matter what type of person they are, what their background is, how much experience they have or where they are from. GitLab’s commitment to diversity and inclusion has allowed them to hire a very diverse work force, and in return, creates a more innovative and creative environment.

Finally, GitLab’s culture emphasizes learning and growth. It is a company that expects its employees to constantly be learning and keeping up with industry. The emphasis on learning and growing fosters a workforce that performs at a high level and can also adapt.

To sum it up, the culture of gitlab is a strong inner force that is directing it’s resourcing and talent strategies. The company’s dedication to openness and inclusiveness, not to mention learning and growth, makes for a very comfortable and supportive atmosphere that is conducive to the hiring and maintaining of the best employees. Which then allows GitLab to create high performing teams and meet its strategic goals.

However, GitLab’s company culture is the backbone of the resourcing and talent strategy. But, if it wishes to continue flourishing, there are several things that the company should do. One area for enhancement is to foster even deeper levels of inclusivity. While GitLab has made significant strides in creating a diverse and welcoming environment, ongoing efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion can further strengthen the company’s culture and attract a wider range of talent. This could involve implementing more targeted diversity and inclusion initiatives, providing unconscious bias training, and creating employee resource groups.

Another area to focus on is strengthening employee engagement. While GitLab’s culture already promotes engagement, the company could explore additional strategies to foster a stronger sense of connection and belonging among employees. Whether this means more virtual or in person social functions, peer to peer recognition, or the ability for employees to participate in the companies’ social responsibility programs. To go even further into that learning and growing culture, GitLab could put some money into individual development plans for each employee. These would be very personalized career paths that would allow employees to see exactly where they could be going in the company and how to get there. Also the company could do some kind of cross functional work or knowledge sharing, mentor programs or rotation jobs.

With these recommendations GitLab will continue to improve its company culture and it’s resourcing/talent strategy. A culture that is more inviting welcoming and focused on development will not only help us to attract and retain the best and the brightest but it will also foster innovative performance.

Justified recommendations as to how GitLab can improve the effectiveness of its employee induction programme

GitLab’s onboarding process is an integral part of it’s talent strategy. To make it better the company might want to develop a more personal, interactive orientation process. The current onboarding process for GitLab is giving the new employee the handbook, introducing them to some of the key team members, and assigning them some projects (Jones, 2022). While this approach is valuable, a more personalized approach could help new employees feel more welcomed, valued, and connected to the company culture.

A mentor for each new person that is hired is one way to do this. This mentor can provide guidance, support, and answer any questions the new employee may have (Santos et al, 2024). Also, GitLab could develop an organized induction process with defined benchmarks and performance standards. This would help new employees understand their role within the company and what is expected of them. Also, interactive things like virtual team building or even get togethers can make the new hires feel like they are a part of the company more. That can also help with the loneliness problem, which can be a major issue among remote workers.

By implementing a more personalized and engaging employee induction program, GitLab can improve the effectiveness of its onboarding process and help new hires feel more welcomed, valued, and connected to the company. Whereas this could ultimately result in employee satisfaction, engagement, and retention.

The second is that in order to improve its employee orientation program even more, GitLab might want to include more inductions for new employees to understand the mission and values and history of the company (Sharma & Stol, 2020). Now the orientation does a little bit of that like the history of the company and what the company is trying to do. But, a look into GitLab’s mission, values, and past will probably give a new employee a better understanding of the purpose of the company and what they are doing to help it succeed.

That might include a special “GitLab 101” meeting that all the new employees attend to hear about the founding of the company, and the major events and important principles of the company. GitLab could also host some kind of virtual tour of the company offices/facilities for new hires so that they can see what the company is like and the atmosphere in which they will be working. And by educating the new hires about the mission, the values, the history of the company, they will have a much stronger sense of belonging and commitment to their jobs. That could ultimately lead to more employee engagement, and job satisfaction and retention.

To evaluate the effectiveness of GitLab’s employee induction program, the company can implement a comprehensive evaluation process that includes several key components (Ramos-Villagrasa et al, 2019). First, GitLab can distribute surveys to new hires shortly after completing the program to gather their feedback on the onboarding experience. They should have some surveys on how well the new hires think they understand the companies culture, values and expectations, also how happy they are with the support their mentors or other team members have provided them.

Second, GitLab can collect feedback from managers who have supervised new hires who have recently completed the induction program. Managers can give feedback on whether the new hires seem to be ready to assume their responsibilities, if they have a clear understanding of the company’s mission and objectives, and how well they seem to be fitting in with the rest of the team. Third, GitLab can also measure the performance of new hires within their first few months, and see how well new hires that went through the induction program performed compared to those did not. That way, a relationship can be determined between the effectiveness of the induction program and the KPIs.

Lastly, GitLab can track the attrition rates of new hires that have gone through the orientation. The company can then look at the number of new hires that have gone through the program and how many of those people stayed compared to those who didn’t go through the program, and they will be able to determine if the induction program is doing what it is suppose to do which is keep the employee happy and reduce the turnover rate. Finally, GitLab can conduct interviews or focus groups with new hires and managers to gather qualitative feedback on the induction program. This can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the program and help identify areas for improvement.

With the use of these three types of evaluations, GitLab is able to see how well its new employee orientation program is working and what could be changed. This information can be used to refine the program and ensure that it continues to meet the needs of new hires and the company as a whole.

Short and a long-term approaches to meet current and future demand for talent, providing justification for why each would be appropriate.

GitLab could take a shorter term approach to workforce planning through skills assessment and development (Li, 2022). Given the rapid pace of technological advancements and the ever-evolving landscape of software development, it is imperative for GitLab to ensure that its employees possess the necessary skills to meet current and future demands. A complete skills inventory would be a good way to see exactly what the workforce is lacking and what should be worked on first.

GitLab could get a good idea of the strong points and weaknesses of its entire work force if they did periodic evaluations of everyone’s skills and abilities. This data can be utilized to see where further training or development is required. So once these key areas are recognized, then GitLab knows where to concentrate their training abilities according to the level of importance to the company’s prosperity. If so, then GitLab needs to provide some targeted training and development programs to close those gaps. These programs should be tailored to the specific needs of individual employees and teams, ensuring that employees receive the training they need to develop their skills and advance their careers.

Besides that, GitLab should also help to create an environment that encourages continuous learning and also provide employees the chance to develop themselves professionally (Dachner et al, 2021). This could include attending conferences, webinars, or online courses, as well as participating in mentorship programs or job rotations. By encouraging employees to continuously learn and grow, GitLab can ensure that its workforce remains competitive and adaptable. Not to mention that GitLab already has experienced employees that it can utilize. By identifying employees with specialized knowledge and skills, the company can encourage them to share their expertise with others through mentoring, coaching, or knowledge-sharing sessions. This can also lead to a more educated and trained labour force and an atmosphere of cooperation and group work.

It makes sense to take a short-term approach to assessing and developing skills since Gitlab is in the software development industry and that field is constantly changing. The field of technology is always evolving and it seems as if there are hundreds of new tools, frameworks, and programming languages popping up every day (Wimelius et al, 2021). That is to say that employees must be constantly upgrading their skills to remain useful. This way GitLab can see right away if there are any lacks in the current employee’s skills and train them to meet the current needs of the business.

Besides, with a short term focus, GitLab would be abler to adapt to shifts in the market or consumer demands. GitLab should continually evaluate the skills of their employees and train them accordingly so that as new challenges and opportunities present themselves, they will have the workforce ready to accept them. Also, short term is always cheaper than long term. That way GitLab wont waste time and money on training programs that may not be applicable or necessary in the future.

To sum it all up, it is only logical that GitLab would employ a short-term approach to skills assessment and development, because of the fast-paced, ever-changing world that is the software development industry. This way GitLab can easily spot and close any gaps in skills, adapt to shifts in the market, and simply be sure that all of the employees are fully prepared to do what the business needs done.

GitLab’s Long-Term Workforce Planning

Long-term strategic workforce planning is critical to the future success of GitLab in the competitive software development industry. GitLab must implement a strategic talent management plan that will allow it to attract, develop, and retain the best people in order to set itself up for future growth and innovation (Whysall et al, 2019). One important aspect of this plan is a strong recruiting program. GitLab should actively seek out and recruit top talent from diverse sources, such as universities, colleges, and online job boards. By partnering with educational institutions, GitLab can tap into a pipeline of recent graduates with the latest skills and knowledge. Also, GitLab should utilize social media and online job boards in order to access a larger number of possible applicants. To get the best people Gitlab would need to provide compensation and benefits that are at least in line with the industry.

Another important element of a long-term talent management strategy is to invest in employee development programs (Ozkeser, 2019). Whether it’s by sending employees to conferences, online courses, or mentorship programs, it’s important that GitLab provides its workforce with the knowledge and skills that it needs to be successful in the future. This will not only enhance employee performance but also foster a culture of continuous learning and growth.

Succession planning is also essential for GitLab’s long-term success. By identifying and developing high-potential employees who can be groomed for leadership roles, GitLab can ensure that it has a pipeline of talent to fill key positions as employees retire or move on to other opportunities (Bano et al, 2022). This will ensure that the company will continue to run without any interruptions. Another key element to a long term talent management strategy is a strong performance management system. If GitLab recognizes and honours those who do the best work, it will not only inspire the workers, but also stimulate them to perform at their peak. The way to do this is to have a complete talent management strategy that is geared toward acquiring, growing and keeping the best employees, so that GitLab will have the human resources to reach its strategic goals and continue to compete in the marketplace. This will allow the company to build an innovative culture and to grow and prosper in the long run.

Long term strategic workforce planning is necessary for GitLab because the software development industry is so volatile and the company’s growth goals are so aggressive. It should be noted that GitLab invests in talent acquisition, development, and retention, so that it will always have a pool of trained, motivated employees to fuel its future expansion. In the long run, that will make GitLab a really desirable place to work, and we’ll be able to get the best people. Furthermore, taking the long-term approach will allow GitLab to establish an innovative and “continuous improvement” culture. GitLab should invest in its employee development and give its employees room to grow, that way the employee will be more likely to think outside the box and help the company grow as well.

In conclusion, strategic workforce planning is the key to GitLab’s future. That is, through investing in acquiring, developing, and keeping talent the organization can be certain that they have the right people on board to accomplish their strategic goals and keep a competitive edge.

Evaluate two contemporary methods that utilise technology to manage both individual and team performance within the context of the GitLab

The remote-first software firm GitLab has taken full advantage of technology to make their performance management as efficient as possible. One modern approach that GitLab employs is Objectives and Key Results (OKRs). OKRs are a method of setting goals that helps the individual and team goals line up with the company’s overall strategy (Shamsub, 2024). GitLab as a company is able to use OKRs in a way that increases transparency and accountability and employee engagement, all because of technology.

OKRs are used at GitLab to set very specific, very lofty goals for individuals and teams. These objectives also coincide with the general mission and vision of the company, so everyone is striving for the same goal. OKRs are usually set each quarter and can be viewed by any employee, thus encouraging transparency and responsibility. GitLab has an OKR platform to help facilitate its use. This platform allows employees to set their own OKRs, track progress, and provide updates on their achievements. It also makes it easy for the team members to work with each other and communicate, so that each person’s goals meet the goals of the team.

The use of OKRs at GitLab has several benefits (Stray et al, 2022). First, OKRs ensure that the individual and the team goals line up with the goals of the company as a whole, that gives a sense of direction, a sense of purpose. Second, by making OKRs publicly visible, GitLab fosters transparency and accountability, creating a culture of trust and collaboration. Third, OKRs help employees to prioritize their work and focus on what matters most, leading to increased productivity and efficiency. Fourth, OKRs can help to create a sense of ownership and empowerment among employees, as they understand how their work contributes to the company’s success. Lastly, OKRs can track and provide feedback on how well an individual is doing, and what they are doing, which in turn can be used to make decisions and find weak points.

OKRs have served GitLab well, but there are some issues and things to be aware of. If OKRs are set too high, they can be demotivating and lead to frustration. It’s important to strike a balance between ambitious and achievable goals. Not only that, OKRs need to be continually tracked and checked to see if they are working. OKRs lose their punch when not held accountable. Lastly, it is hard to introduce OKRs when the employees don’t want to change. It’s important to communicate the benefits of OKRs and provide training and support to help employees adapt to the new system.

All in all, GitLab’s use of OKRs is a good case of technology being utilized for the better of performance management. GitLab has done this by establishing very specific and challenging objectives for the company and then giving the employees the means and assistance necessary to reach those goals, thereby fostering a climate of transparency, responsibility, and employee involvement. Although there are negatives to think about, the positives of using OKRs exceed the negatives.

Secondly, GitLab has adopted Agile Project Management strategies to optimize team productivity and better serve customers’ needs. One of the Agile frameworks that GitLab uses is Scrum which is very common. Scrum is a lightweight framework that emphasizes iterative development, collaboration, and continuous improvement (Rodríguez et al, 2019). GitLab has been able to use Scrum through technology, and it has been able to use scrum in a way that supports it’s remote first culture, and allows for maximum productivity from the team. In GitLab, Scrum teams usually consist of a product owner, a Scrum master, and a development team. The product owner is the one who writes the product backlog, which is basically a prioritized list of product features and requirements. The Scrum master is the facilitator for that process and is responsible for the team following Agile principles and practices. It is the development team that delivers the product increments. GitLab uses many different tools and technologies to facilitate its Scrum process. These range from project management software to version control systems, communication tools, and time tracking software. By leveraging these tools, GitLab is able to streamline its project management processes, collaborate effectively, and track progress efficiently.

The use of Scrum at GitLab has several benefits (Ekechi et al, 2024). The first advantage of Scrum is that it is iterative, meaning that it allows the team to deliver value to the customer, much more quickly and efficiently. The second is that scrum encourages the members of a team to work together and share responsibility. Third, Scrum is adaptable to changing requirements, allowing teams to respond to feedback and adjust their plans as needed. Fourth, Scrum’s focus on continuous improvement helps teams to deliver higher-quality products. Lastly, Scrum can also improve customer satisfaction because it delivers value to the customer in each of the small releases.

Scrum has been a great asset to GitLab, but there are some cons and points to consider. Scrum is hard to put in place when people don’t want change. To ensure that the team members are comfortable with the new way of work, there should be some training and support. Also, if teams get caught up in their sprints, they forget about the overall project. It’s important to balance the need for speed with the need for quality. Besides, Scrum only works if the product owner is very active. If the product owner is not hands-on, that can cause misalignment and lack of efficiency. Finally, scaling Scrum across large organizations can be challenging. There has to be some framework for scaling scrum and some sort of support structure for the teams.

In summary, GitLab’s application of Scrum is a great case of Agile Project Management, because it helped improve the team’s performance, and also delivered value to the customers. Through the use of technology to facilitate the Scrum process, GitLab has been able to surmount some obstacles and enjoy the fruits that the Scrum methodology has to offer. While there are challenges to consider, the overall benefits of Scrum make it a valuable tool for software development teams.

References

Arefeen, M. S., & Schiller, M. (2019). Continuous integration using GitLab. Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology Journal, 3, 1-6.

Bano, Y., Omar, S. S., & Ismail, F. (2022). Succession planning best practices for organizations: A systematic literature review approach. International Journal of Global Optimization and Its Application, 1(1), 39-48.

Choudhury, P., Crowston, K., Dahlander, L., Minervini, M. S., & Raghuram, S. (2020). GitLab: work where you want, when you want. Journal of Organization Design, 9, 1-17.

Dachner, A. M., Ellingson, J. E., Noe, R. A., & Saxton, B. M. (2021). The future of employee development. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100732.

Ekechi, C. C., Okeke, C. D., & Adama, H. E. (2024). Enhancing agile product development with scrum methodologies: A detailed exploration of implementation practices and benefits. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(5), 1542-1570.

Jones, J. (2022). Historical Background and Related State-of-the-Art Concepts.

Li, L. (2022). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4.0 and beyond. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-16.

Ozkeser, B. (2019). Impact of training on employee motivation in human resources management. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 802-810.

Painter, J. (2024). Working the Remote Life. In Practical GitLab Services: A Complete DevOps Guide for Developers and Administrators (pp. 65-91). Berkeley, CA: Apress.

Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Barrada, J. R., Fernández-del-Río, E., & Koopmans, L. (2019). Assessing job performance using brief self-report scales: The case of the individual work performance questionnaire. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 35(3), 195-205.

Rodríguez, F., Vigueras, D., Cerrato Lara, M., Rampérez Martín, V., Soriano Camino, F. J., & Vigueras González, G. A. (2019). A collaborative learning platform to assess the use of agile methodologies in engineering studies.

Santos, I., Felizardo, K. R., Steinmacher, I., & Gerosa, M. A. (2024). Software solutions for newcomers’ onboarding in software projects: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 107568.

Shamsub, H. (2024). OKRs for Remote Work: Achieving Success and Productivity in a Virtual Environment. Arisia.

Sharma, G. G., & Stol, K. J. (2020). Exploring onboarding success, organizational fit, and turnover intention of software professionals. Journal of Systems and Software, 159, 110442.

Stray, V., Gundelsby, J. H., Ulfsnes, R., & Brede Moe, N. (2022, May). How agile teams make Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) work. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Processes and International Conference on Global Software Engineering (pp. 104-109).

Whysall, Z., Owtram, M., & Brittain, S. (2019). The new talent management challenges of Industry 4.0. Journal of management development, 38(2), 118-129.

Wimelius, H., Mathiassen, L., Holmström, J., & Keil, M. (2021). A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation. Information systems journal, 31(1), 198-225.